Go Shopping Cart Site Map User Panel and Admin English Home

Home > Easypano Forum    Easypano Forum has been upgraded.

Easypano Forum


Welcome Guest Register Login Search The Forum Display List of Forum Members
 All Forums
  Panoweaver
 
Subject Topic: leveller or panhead Post Reply Post New Topic
Message posted by Susz on October-06-2008 at 12:24pm
View Susz's Profile Profile   Search for other posts by Susz Search   Quote Susz Quote   Send Private Message Send Msg  
Susz
Standard Member
Standard Member
United Kingdom
March-28-2006
33 Posts

I have the Agnos Mrotator and am trying to decide whether to get another panhead or a Nodal Ninja leveller to save having to alter the tripod legs to level up. What do other people use?


Message posted by smooth on October-06-2008 at 2:20pm
View smooth's Profile Profile   Search for other posts by smooth Search   Visit smooth's Homepage www   Quote smooth Quote   Send Private Message Send Msg  
smooth
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Australia
November-23-2002
5401 Posts

Hi Susz,

  • Fanotec E-Z Leveler
  • Manfrotto Ball Head 486RC2
  • Manfrotto #222 Pistol Grip
  • Manfrotto #322RC2 Pistol Grip

All do the job nicely.

I still prefer the Manfrotto #222 Pistol Grip, though I do have all the others. But it does leave a larger footprint because of the lever.

Regards, Smooth


Message posted by Susz on October-06-2008 at 4:52pm
View Susz's Profile Profile   Search for other posts by Susz Search   Quote Susz Quote   Send Private Message Send Msg  
Susz
Standard Member
Standard Member
United Kingdom
March-28-2006
33 Posts

Thanks for the reply Smooth. The Nodal Ninja leveler was recommended by a supplier as opposed to a head as they reckoned a head would make it too bulky to use. If you recommend the #222 pistol grip, that's good enough recommendation for me. I'll route one out.

Does the larger footprint become a major problem?

 

 


Message posted by 360texas on October-07-2008 at 11:49am
View 360texas's Profile Profile   Search for other posts by 360texas Search   Visit 360texas's Homepage www   Quote 360texas Quote   Send Private Message Send Msg  
360texas
Avatar
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
United States
June-12-2002
2240 Posts

Issue here is that either the Ball Head or Pistol Grip must have capacity support equipment weight + safety margin.  The 488RC2 support weight is 17.6 pounds or (at 2.2 pounds/kilogram) = 7.818 kg   on an angle.

I bought a 1/2" diameter ball head thinking of saving some lifting weight.  Found out that when placing the pan head with camera/ lens on an off center angle... the rig slid off center and I could not get it to ball to lock tight enough to hold.   Answer was to get a ball head with a larger diameter ball.  The 488RC2 has a 1 1/2" diameter ball and rated for 17.6 pounds... locked tight.. holds all in place.

So even though your click stop rotator, Pan head bracket, Camera, lens weight might only add to 10 pounds... the ball/pistol head should be support rated at least 40 -50% more than the equipment weight.

Who knows you might buy a new heavier weighted camera next time and you will be glad you have a ball head that will still work.

Manfrotto Ball Head 486RC2  6kg x2.2 = 13.2 lbs

Manfrotto Ball Head 488RC2  8kg x 2.2 = 17 lbs

Manfrotto #222 Pistol Grip   2.5 kg  x 2.2 = 5 1/2  lbs 

Some equipment weights

Canon 40d            822 gr
Sigma 8mm          400
MrotatorTCP +B 1250

Total                   2.472 kg (x 2.2)  or around 5 1/2 lbs

Suggest you add up your equipment weight above the tripod top.



-------------
/s/
Dave
Forum Moderator for
EasyPano - Panoweaver
Pano2VR


Visit 360texas.com

If you wish to post a reply to this thread you must first Login
If you are not already registered you must first register

Forum Jump Post Reply Post New Topic
Printer Friendly Version Printable version

Powered by: - Web Wiz Guide Discussion Forums