Hmmm people here on the forum will say.. you far better off with a dSLR because of its larger 2/3 rds CCD. Bigger CCD, more pixels to capture, more detail, higher image dynamic range, more lens selection and over all just a better deal. Some of the panoramas I have seen on forum members sites support this logic.
Few issues I have with dSLR's are,
No digital viewfinder. You can only see your image on playback mode.
We normally take portrait panorama image series. The Nikon D70/ D100 does not have a full circle (3 or 4 images) Nikkor fisheye. Using a Nikkor 10.5 (a 16mm) requires 6 to 8 images +2 up/down. I have heard that Sigma 8mm can be used with some success but it is not as sharp as a Nikkor lens.
Assuming your dSLR was purchased with a zoomable lens. You must change to prime fisheye lens for panorama work. Changing lenses exposes the CCD to unwanted dust particles which show up on your otherwise crystal clear imaging as undesireable artifacts. This is an on-going built in maintance issue.
For my understanding... that is too many issues with dSLR's at this time.
Regarding the clarity of the FC-E9 versus the E8. Don't know all we use is the E8.
For most folks "Toy" = "Tool".
Dave
------------- /s/
Dave
Forum Moderator for
EasyPano - Panoweaver
Pano2VR
Visit 360texas.com
|