I also have had a D300 for about 2 months now.  Just back from a 2 week (2,000 shots/30+ gigs) photo trip in Arizona putting the camera through its paces. Love it even more. Thom Hogan's e-book is a "must have". Check his website out as see all his reviews - he is the Nikon guru. www.bythom.com

Just out of interest, how many hours does it take you to create 10 tours for your fellow Realtors? Shooting time & processing time must be a full day's work?While I am still learning to use the software it seems to take me up to an hour just to get one tour to stitch together.

I am building a website for pro photography and will be offering Easypano tours as well as lower priced conventional type VT's. You are well ahead of me so hope I can learn for your experiences.

I do not mean to be rude but 12 hours or more work for $100.00 is the problem with real estate photography.  You cannot make a living with the overhead of professional equipment at $12.00/hr or less.  Also, agents will not hire someone more expensive as long as someone in the market is willing to do it cheaper.  Jerry your quality is better than most real estate work so why sell yourself short?  You are cheating yourself from what you deserve and help set a benchmark that other photographers cannot touch. Once you throw in the high price of gas, drive time and posting fees for a tour the profit margin goes down even further.  Industry under pricing whether intentional or not in the end hurts all of the players in the game.  Jerry, please do not take this as a personal attack on you but just my thoughts on the real estate pano business as a whole.  Low pricing and high expenses in my market have all but made me to abandon real estate photography as a viable revenue source. 

Good luck with the new camera...
TTurner    
p.s. There is plenty of work for all so why go cheap?

I agree with you 100% TTurner. The problem is most agents use slideshows and call that a virtual tour, and get away with it. As a Realtor myself I understand where the agent is coming from. If they pay 2 or 300 bucks and after commission split on a 150K house they will be lucky to net $1000. Then the problem is what if the house does not sell. They are out all their expenses. I know a 150K house is cheap for most areas but here it is the bread and butter house.
But as I said I only charge $100 for in-house agents. That also helps me as they will give me a referral before others. Other agents I will charge at least $150 for a basic tour. However I have not gone after that market yet. I need to get this new equipment up and running. I would love to get away from real estate VT's but have to get better before I feel comfortable asking the big bucks.
Thanks for the comments and no offense taken as I do agree with you. Thanks for the comments on my quality.

Jerry I am still having my website built so won't be in business for a month or more. I expect my mainstream real estate photography to come from pans and zooms through still pictures. These are quick and easy to do so the prices can reflect.  However Panoweaver tours are something else.  I plan on charging much higher rates for those. A one room Panoweaver tour will be 2 to 3 times the cost of 4 still picture pan/zoom VT's & 6 still pictures. I doubt many Realtors will pay the extra cost for Panoweaver other than for high end property, but they make a good talking point and demonstrate well.

I am also a Realtor and know how hard times are having had little income this year. Most Realtors just don't have any money. I plan on offering both low cost basic tours as well as higher end tours.

Just as an aside I will also be offering Podcasts and audio links for Realtors.