Well,
I can see both sides of this argument.
I think those who purchased Version 1.0 are at a disadvantage, as the full information was not disclosed when they made their choice.
Do you think it would be better if you could also add your own information in this right click window?
For those who use this product for making money, I don't see why you would want to promote the program that "helped" build the tour for FREE.
This is an age old argument with software developers. When is a PRO program not a pro program? When it has the developers badge all over it!
Will this help or hinder sales? Time will tell!
For me, this box should have MY information with "maybe" one "last" line that reads assembled with tourweaver v1.1 but not a "Hyperlink" that leads directly to show my customer how to do his own panorama work. If it is/was to contain a Hyperlink then that hyperlink should at the very least be connected to an affiliate program that you get a kick back from should the customer spend money buying software from the developer who's product you are unwittingly promoting and advertising on your server with panorama you took the time to "take and build".
All very interesting! Personally I don't very much like the idea of a mouse right click pop up at all. Maybe that is why people use PTViewer Rather then Quick Time and others that use this right mouse click method. "Flash" is not comparable because their is no alternative.
But with Panorama display the choices are many and varied. Who gets the money is basically up to the consumer.
Just my thoughts.
Regards, Smooth
|